In recent statements, PML-N leader Rana Sanaullah claimed that PTI deliberately obstructed Justice Mansoor Ali Shah’s path to becoming the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP). According to Sanaullah, PTI’s actions were calculated moves aimed at influencing judicial appointments and ensuring the judiciary aligned with its political interests. He argues that PTI’s interference in the judicial process has disrupted the traditional merit-based selection procedure, raising concerns over the impartiality and independence of the judiciary.
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, known for his expertise, integrity, and fair decision-making, was seen as a strong candidate for the CJP position. Many anticipated his appointment would strengthen judicial independence. However, Sanaullah claims that PTI’s interference was part of a broader plan to shape the judiciary according to their preferences. Allegedly, PTI made use of its political leverage and influence within the system to slow down or block Justice Shah’s elevation.
This alleged interference has sparked significant debate across Pakistan, with many questioning PTI’s influence on judicial proceedings. Political analysts are concerned that such actions may weaken public trust in the legal system, which is supposed to be free from political agendas. The accusations have also sparked a conversation about judicial reform, with calls for measures to safeguard the appointment process to ensure transparency, independence, and merit-based selections.
Sanaullah’s remarks have highlighted the delicate balance between politics and judiciary and have raised urgent questions about the need to protect Pakistan’s judicial independence. Political analysts suggest that transparent reforms could protect the judiciary from future political interference and uphold the credibility of Pakistan’s legal system in the eyes of the public.
